Farmer-led investments in agricultural land and water management (ALWM) are transforming livelihoods and food security across South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Potential exists for even greater benefits, for even more beneficiaries. Understanding what factors influence adoption and impact of ALWM interventions can help ensure sustainable, positive effects of future investments. WLE has designed a suite of tools and investment models to support policy makers and development agents to leverage and extend the investments farmers are already making.
- Understand what drives farmers’ decision making, management practices and their impacts on the landscape: The use of participatory tools can shed light on decision-making processes, preferences, trade-offs and the factors that influence adoption and change.
- Facilitate equitable access to ALWM technologies: Improve access to credit, information and irrigation services to enable more informed and productive investment, management and marketing choices by smallholder farmers.
- Create policy synergies across sectors: Facilitate cross-sector innovation (e.g., between agriculture and rural energy) to broaden the solution space for enhancing smallholder productivity and livelihood benefits, while minimizing potential environmental externalities.
- Promote investments in water and energy recovery and reuse: A significant development opportunity in the rural-urban interface exists to safely convert human waste into a resource that simultaneously benefits farmers, improves sanitation and generating new business opportunities.
- Invest in a watershed perspective: Successfully scaling up the benefits and effectively managing the risks posed by ALWM requires planning at a watershed scale and across sectors.
Of the 2.5 billion people who depend directly on the food and agricultural sector for their livelihoods, 1.5 billion live in smallholder households.   These households manage nearly 500 million farms and contribute an appreciable share of agricultural production and food calories in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.   Appropriate investments in ALWM generate substantial benefits for smallholders, including increased and stabilized farm incomes as well as improved land and labor productivity. They can also provide important additional benefits such as off-farm rural and urban employment, enhanced nutrition and greater resilience to seasonal and climate shocks.  
However, a number of constraints hamper the potential of ALWM investments, including low adoption or subsequent abandonment of interventions, failure to target and engage key segments of rural communities such as women and poorer farmers, and inadequate consideration of aggregated impacts. Research to understand the factors that affect farmers’ decision making can support the design of context-appropriate ALWM investments that strengthen smallholder farming’s contribution to poverty alleviation and food security.
Enhancing smallholder productivity
The positive livelihood and food security impacts from ALWM investments are well documented. For example, in Ethiopia, earthen embankments to enhance infiltration of rainwater have doubled sorghum yields. In southern Niger, farmer-managed natural land regeneration—using improved, local agroforestry practices on nearly 5 million ha of land—has increased cereal production and improved the livelihoods of an estimated 2.5 million people. Farm ponds in Madhya Pradesh, India, have allowed farmers to produce more staple crops, extend the cropping area, increase dry-season cropping, diversify activities and increase incomes by as much as 70%. And long-term studies on integrated watershed management programs in dryland areas of India document multiple, positive livelihood and environmental benefits (e.g.   .)
In both rural and urban areas, smallholder farmers themselves are increasingly initiating and financing small-scale ALWM technologies and practices.  Surveys carried out in Ghana, Ethiopia and Zambia, for example, found that more than 80% of all owners of small-scale irrigation equipment used their own or their family’s savings for the investment, and in many countries small private irrigation is already more important than public irrigation schemes in terms of land area, number of people served and income (Fig. 1).  
Fig. 1: Farmers' reliance on different types of irrigation in Ghana
Significant potential exists for further growth in smallholder agricultural productivity: targeted investments and associated policy interventions could double or even triple rainfed crop yields in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, while generating additional net household revenues for millions of people (Table 1).
Table 1: Potential benefits from investments in three types of AWLM
However, achieving this potential requires more than just changes in agricultural production; it requires a better understanding of the complex constraints faced by smallholder farmers as well as the opportunities for integrated solutions. Solutions that cut across sectors and scales and support existing farmer-led initiatives have potential to achieve more equitable, productive and sustainable smallholder farming systems.
The complex challenges faced by smallholder farmers
Smallholder farming systems are influenced by an array of ecological, social, economic and political factors specific to the context in which they operate. Yet, research on improving smallholder ALWM has tended to focus on technical solutions for increasing agricultural productivity. This rather narrow view overlooks the range of factors that shape farmers’ perceptions, choices, constraints and decision making as well as the broader impacts on the landscape and supporting ecosystem services.  
Many technologies remain out of reach of smallholder farmers. Women and resource-poor farmers are particularly disadvantaged and face serious challenges in accessing affordable ALWM technologies. Challenges include high up-front investment costs, absence of proper financing tools and limited access to information that would enable them to make informed investment, management and marketing choices. Women are underrepresented in the use and ownership of small-scale irrigation equipment. Research in Ghana and Zambia suggests that men are more likely to own motorized pumps, and in general pump owners have a significantly higher wealth status.
Market inefficiencies often prevent farmers from accessing beneficial technologies and optimizing their land and water management. These inefficiencies include poorly developed supply chains; high taxes and transaction costs; and lack of information and knowledge on irrigation, seeds, marketing and equipment. Farmers are disadvantaged particularly by their lack of up-to-date market knowledge, which undermines their negotiating position and enables traders and brokers to take advantage of them. 
Finally, the uncontrolled and unregulated spread of ALWM technologies can have undesirable social and environmental consequences. If not managed and governed within the context of the wider landscape and other water users’ needs, accelerated investments in smallholder ALWM could further degrade water and soil quality as well as create conflicts over shared natural resources.  
The need for integrated ALWM investment approaches
Research clearly indicates that many diverse factors influence local water and land management decisions. Consequently, narrowly defined ALWM interventions, made without consideration for the environmental and social context, will likely neither solve important, complementary issues for farmers nor address cross-scale, inter-sectoral, synergies and trade-offs.  
Secured land tenure, for example, may incentivize farmers to make long-term investments in land and water management. However, research on land policies in Ethiopia and Ghana suggests that on their own, policies to strengthen land ownership or use rights may not be enough. Efforts are also needed to improve legal literacy about the accompanying rights, including the use of land as collateral for credit. Further, a singular focus on improving land rights may risk marginalizing other locally identified needs for productive farming systems, such as access to water resources, financial services and off-farm marketing opportunities.    
Rapid urbanization creates important cross-scale linkages and challenges. Nearly 456 million ha—an area about the size of the European Union—is under cultivation in and around the world’s cities. Agricultural intensification in close proximity to urban environments provides smallholder farmers with better access to markets and stable demand for produce. However, inadequate waste management compromises the water bodies used by urban and peri-urban farmers and downstream communities and thus the food safety of urban consumers. In Ghana, for example, an estimated 800,000 urban consumers benefit daily from leafy vegetables produced within the city, but these same consumers are also at risk as most of these crops are irrigated with water from polluted sources.
Finally, policies outside of the agricultural realm can also influence ALWM investment outcomes. Solar-powered irrigation is a classic example that demonstrates the interconnectedness of the water, food and energy sectors. Technological advances in solar pumps coupled with state subsidy programs are causing a major expansion of low-cost tube wells with a lower carbon footprint in India. It is also starting to take hold in sub-Saharan Africa, where solar-powered pumps can serve as a more versatile, off-grid, green alternative to diesel or electric pumps. However, this low-cost, climate-smart intervention may threaten already vulnerable aquifers if not integrated with interventions and incentives that jointly address the related energy, livelihoods and water resource trade-offs.  
Solutions to support improved private and public sector investment
A range of complementary institutional and policy measures that cut across scales and sectors are needed for smallholder ALWM to sustainably achieve its productivity and poverty reduction potential. WLE is contributing tools and business models to support this aim.
Decision-making and engagement tools
Key to long-term, sustainable ALWM investments is an increased understanding of what drives farmers’ choices with due consideration of gender-based differences in preference, responsibilities and access to land and water resources. WLE has developed several participatory tools that can shed light on such decision-making processes and the factors that influence adoption and change.
- The Evaluating Land Management Options (ELMO) tool uses participatory techniques to investigate the factors that influence farmers’ uptake (or rejection) of sustainable land management options, supplementing conventional biophysical and socioeconomic research. It elicits explanations of the advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs associated with different land management choices as they relate to farmers’ needs, aspirations, opportunities and constraints.
- The Gender in Irrigation Learning and Improvement Tool (GILIT) identifies which policies and operational procedures in formal irrigation schemes need adjustment to promote gender equity. The tool can facilitate learning and support equitable standards by collecting feedback and ideas for specific actions to address gender inequities in the management of irrigation schemes.
- Experimental games, otherwise known as framed field experiments (Box 1), can serve to gain insights into farmers’ decisions regarding resource management and as a means to strengthen cooperation on shared resources. Through a variety of applications in South Asia, Southeast Asia and Central America, experimental games have played a triple role in a) raising farmers’ awareness of how their decisions influence the quantity and quality of common resources (e.g., groundwater), b) encouraging discussion and building of community-based institutions, and c) providing researchers and implementers with insights into the factors that affect farmers’ choices.     
- Agricultural innovation platforms (AIPs) provide an opportunity to engage the diversity of actors in irrigation schemes for learning, capacity development and experimentation (e.g., with crops, marketing, watering regimes). Small-scale irrigation schemes are highly complex systems and improving their efficiency (economically, socially and resource-wise) requires supportive institutional arrangements, a clear vision shared by all actors and careful attention to the incentives for change. WLE-supported research has found that AIPs can facilitate more cohesive networks, where the dynamics and feedbacks across actors, systems and processes lead to learning and adaptation, improved system efficiency and greater returns on investments.  
Box 1: Games for sustainability
Framed field experiments are frequently used to obtain a better understanding of how decisions on the use of natural resources are being made and which factors affect cooperation decisions. These games simulate real-life decision making, such as selecting the most efficient irrigation techniques and the best crops for a certain area, and they can be used as an entry point for facilitating discussion among community members. The games offer players insights into the interconnectedness of shared resources, and researchers and practitioners can use the games to collect data and explore potential for strengthening water management and fostering cooperation. For WLE’s implementing partner in India, the Foundation for Ecological Security, experimental games have become an integral part of the organization’s engagement with rural communities, especially on issues related to ground and surface water management. The games have been administered in different socioeconomic and biophysical contexts and have fostered shared learning and solution development.  
Investment pathways and business models
WLE is designing a suite of investment models for ALWM that policy makers and development agents may use to facilitate investments in support of smallholder farmers and the complex landscapes in which they operate.
Increasing equitable access to ALWM technologies: In parts of India and increasingly in sub-Saharan Africa smallholders who cannot afford to purchase their own pump can rent one by the day or for a season. Building on this concept of pump rental markets, WLE researchers created a business model to support the development of irrigation service providers. In this model, an entrepreneur travels from farm to farm with small motor pumps to irrigate land for a fixed fee per hour. WLE is currently seeking opportunities to further pilot and sustainably scale up this business model.
Turning waste into a valuable resource and mitigating risks: Globally, tens of millions of households rely on wastewater irrigation to grow crops. An enormous development opportunity in the rural-urban interface exists to safely convert human waste into a resource that benefits farmers, improves sanitation and generates new business opportunities. WLE has developed and tested resource recovery and reuse business models to support entrepreneurs entering the reuse market, highlighting common barriers and opportunities. These business models have formed the basis for four new public-private partnerships in Ghana, with several more in different stages of review and development in other parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America.
Creating policy synergies for smart solar pump solutions: Solar pump technology can be an excellent tool for expanding poor smallholder farmers’ access to irrigation. However, without proper incentives, the proliferation of low-cost solar pumps could result in overuse of groundwater resources. To maximize the productivity and livelihood benefits, while minimizing potential environmental externalities, WLE is developing a set of business models tailored to different groundwater and energy contexts. In Gujarat, India, WLE scientists and partners are piloting the first-ever solar irrigation cooperative, which enables farmers to sell excess solar power to the utility grid, thereby supplementing farmer income while incentivizing farmers to conserve groundwater resources. In Ethiopia, where only 14% of the population are connected to the electricity grid, WLE researchers have developed a solar irrigation business model, and supporting suitability maps, to target smallholder farmers living in remote rural areas without access to electricity (Fig. 2). A WLE study of alternative business models for solar-powered irrigation pumps in the plains of Nepal has also shown high demand and promising results.
Figure 2: Solar irrigation in Africa
Taking ALWM solutions to scale: Successfully scaling up the benefits and effectively managing the risks posed by ALWM requires planning at a watershed scale and across sectors. The watershed perspective aids to balance trade-offs and issues of environmental sustainability. WLE and its partners are adapting the lessons from decades of research in India on integrated on watershed management to apply in other Asian countries and in sub-Saharan Africa. In the Yewol watershed in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, researchers have worked to strengthen local capacity, facilitated collective action, introduced system compatible technologies and used research to identify niches for integration of technologies at farm and landscape scales. The results of these efforts include improved productivity, crop diversification and downstream water availability, which are benefiting some 15,000 people. Remote-sensing tools are being used prioritize and implement watershed interventions in other locations. Where technologies and financial resources are limited, the tools allow development planners to identify watersheds in high priority zones where relevant socioeconomic and agro-ecological conditions suggest that ALWM interventions could support sustainable development and livelihoods.
Investments in smallholder ALWM are transforming food security and livelihoods in Asia and Africa. The scale of current investments by smallholders is astonishing, and the potential in terms of benefits and beneficiaries is even greater. However, the full potential will not be reached without improved understanding of both the constraints farmers face and the factors that influence their decision making. Understanding and exploring opportunities for integrated solutions, which cut across sectors and scales, and supporting existing farmer-led initiatives will have the potential to support more equitable, productive and sustainable smallholder farming systems.
WLE is contributing ALWM decision-making tools, solutions and implementation strategies to better understand and support improved public and private investment. WLE is also developing and piloting a range of business models to specifically address many of the principle factors that limit ALWM uptake and sustained utilization, including cost, market distortions, unintended consequences, complex multi-sectoral issues and social and institutional contexts. Finally, by adopting a watershed perspective, WLE’s approaches and solutions consider how ALWM practices interact at the landscape scale, critical to sustainably scaling up the food security and livelihood benefits of improved ALWM.
The team acknowledges the contributions and efforts of Meredith Giordano (Principal Researcher, IWMI), Douglas Merrey (independent consultant), and Alexandra Evans (independent consultant) in preparing the content for this series; and Caroline Holo (intern), Miles Bell (intern) and Aishwarya Venkat (intern) for their assistance with literature and data collection. We would also like to acknowledge the support of WLE scientists and partners in the preparation and review of the briefs. This research was supported by CGIAR Fund Donors.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2012. Sustainability pathways: Smallholders and family farmers. Fact sheet. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/Factsheet_SMALLHOLDERS.pdf (accessed on July 21, 2017).
FAO. 2013. Part 1: The setting. In: FAO statistical yearbook 2013: World food and agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Pp. 1-65. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e01.pdf (accessed on July 21, 2017).
Lowder, S.K.; Skoet, J.; Raney, T. 2016. The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development 87: 16-29.
Samberg, L.H.; Gerber, J.S.; Ramankutty, N.; Herrero, M.; West, P.C. 2016. Subnational distribution of average farm size and smallholder contributions to 2014 global food production. Environmental Research Letters 11(12): 124010.
Theis, S.; Passarelli, S.; Bryan, E.; Lefore, N.; Deneke, S.; Nyamadi, B.; Mlote, S. 2016. Promoting gender equality in irrigation. Feed the Future Innovation Laboratory for Small Scale Irrigation (FTF-ILSSI) Project Notes. Available at http://ilssi.tamu.edu/media/1187/ftf-ilssi-project-note-1-gender-equality-in-irrigation.pdf (accessed on July 22, 2017).
Pittock, J.; Bjornlund, H.; Stirzaker, R.; van Rooyen, A. 2017. Communal irrigation systems in South-Eastern Africa: Findings on productivity and profitability. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33(5): 839-847.
Binyam, A.Y.; Desale, K.A. 2015. Rain water harvesting: An option for dry land agriculture in arid and semi-arid Ethiopia. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering 7: 17-28.
Reij, C.; Tappan, G.; Smale, M. 2009. Agroenvironmental Transformation in the Sahel: Another Kind of “Green Revolution”. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00914. Washington, DC, US: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Malik, R.P.S.; Giordano, M.; Sharma, V. 2014. Examining farm-level perceptions, costs, and benefits of small water harvesting structures in Dewas, Madhya Pradesh. Agricultural Water Management 131: 204-211.
Wani, S.P.; Joshi, P.K.; Raju, K.V.; Sreedevi, T.K.; Wilson, M.J.; Shah, A.; Diwakar, P.G.; Palanisami, S.; Marimuthu, S.; Jha, A.K.; Ramakrishna, Y.S.; Sundaram, M.S.S.; D’Souza, M. 2008. Community watershed as a growth engine for development of dryland areas. A comprehensive assessment of watershed programs in India. Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report No. 47. Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT); Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Rural Development. 156p.
Singh, R.; Garg, K.K.; Wani, S.P.; Tewari, R.K.; Dhyani, S.K. 2014. Impact of water management interventions on hydrology and ecosystem services in Garhkundar-Dabar watershed of Bundelkhand region, Central India. Journal of Hydrology 509: 132-149.
Karlberg, L.; Garg, K.K.; Barron, J.; Wani, S.P. 2015. Impacts of agricultural water interventions on farm income: An example from the Kothapally watershed, India. Agricultural Systems 136: 30-38.
Woodhouse, P.; Veldwisch, G.J.; Venot, J.P.; Brockington, D.; Komakech, H.; Manjichi, Â. 2017. African farmer-led irrigation development: Re-framing agricultural policy and investment? The Journal of Peasant Studies 44(1): 213-233.
de Fraiture, C.; Giordano, M. 2014. Small private irrigation: A thriving but overlooked sector. Agricultural Water Management 131: 167-174.
Giordano, M.; de Fraiture, C.; Weight, E.; van der Bliek, J. (Eds.) 2012. Water for wealth and food security: Supporting farmer-driven investments in agricultural water management. Synthesis report of the AgWater Solutions Project. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 50p.
Namara, R.E.; Hope, L.; Sarpong, E.O.; de Fraiture, C.; Owusu, D. 2014. Adoption patterns and constraints pertaining to small-scale water lifting technologies in Ghana. Agricultural Water Management 131: 194-203.
Cordingley, J.E.; Snyder, K.A.; Rosendahl, J.; Kizito, F.; Bossio, D. 2015. Thinking outside the plot: Addressing low adoption of sustainable land management in subSaharan Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 15: 35-40.
Adimassu, Z.; Langan, S.; Johnston, R. 2015. Understanding determinants of farmers’ investments in sustainable land management practices in Ethiopia: Review and synthesis. Environment, Developmentand Sustainability 18(4): 1005-1023.
Snyder, K.A.; Miththapala, S.; Sommer, R.; Braslow, J. 2017. The yield gap: Closing the gap by widening the approach. Experimental Agriculture 53(3): 445-459.
Giordano, M.; de Fraiture, C. 2014. Small private irrigation: Enhancing benefits and managing trade-offs. Agricultural Water Management 131: 175-182.
Bjornlund, H.; van Rooyen, A.; Stirzaker, R. 2017. Profitability and productivity barriers and opportunities in small-scale irrigation schemes. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33(5): 690-704
de Fraiture, C.; Kouali, G.N.; Sally, H.; Kabre, P. 2014. Pirates or pioneers? Unplanned irrigation around small reservoirs in Burkina Faso. Agricultural Water Management 131: 212-20
Dessalegn, M.; Merrey, D. J. 2014. Is ‘Social Cooperation’ for traditional irrigation, while ‘Technology’ is for motor pump irrigation? Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 37p. (IWMI Research Report 161).
Van, M.V.; Van Hien, H.; Thi Phuong, D.; Thi Kim Quyen, N.; Thi Viet Nga, D.; Anh Tuan, L. 2016. Impact of irrigation works systems on livelihoods of fishing community in Ca Mau Peninsula, Viet Nam. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP) 6(7): 460-470.
Cumming, G.S.; Buerkert, A.; Hoffmann, E.M.; Schlecht, E.; von Cramon-Taubadel, S.; Tscharntke, T. 2014. Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature 515: 50-57.
Quisumbing, A.R.; Kumar, N. 2014. Land rights knowledge and conservation in rural Ethiopia: Mind the gender gap. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01386. Available at http://www.gender-gap.net/sites/default/files/documents/ifpridp01386.pdf (accessed on July 21, 2017).
Yami, M.; Snyder, K.A. 2015. After all, land belongs to the state: Examining the benefits of land registration for smallholders in Ethiopia. Land Degradation and Development 27: 465-478.
Dittoh, S.; Snyder, K.A.; Lefore, N. 2015. Gender policies and implementation in agriculture, natural resources and poverty reduction: Case study of Ghana’s Upper East Region. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 22p. (WLE Research for Development (R4D) Learning Series 3).
Kumwenda, I.; van Koppen, B.; Matete, M.; Nhamo, L. 2015. Trends and outlook: Agricultural water management in Southern Africa. Country Report - Malawi. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Available at http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/Other/Reports/PDF/country_report_malawi.pdf (accessed on July 21, 2017).
Thebo, A.L.; Drechsel, P.; Lambin, E.F. Global assessment of urban and peri-urban agriculture: Irrigated and rainfed croplands. Environmental Research Letters 9(11): 114002.
Drechsel, P.; Keraita, B. (eds.). 2014. Irrigated urban vegetable production in Ghana: Characteristics, benefits and risk mitigation. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 247p.
Shah, T.; Durga N.; Verma, S.; Rathod, R. 2016. Solar Power as a Remunerative Crop. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. (IWMI Tata Water Policy Highlight 10). 8p.
Bird, J.; Roy, S.; Shah, T.; Aggarwal, P.; Smakhtin, V.; Amarnath, G.; Amarasinghe, U.A.; Pavelic, P.; McCornick, P.G. 2016. Adapting to climate variability and change in India. In: Water security, climate change and sustainable development, eds., Biswas, A.K.; Tortajada, C. Singapore: Springer. Pp. 41-63.
Emerton, L.; Snyder, K.; Cordingley, J. 2015. Evaluating land management options (ELMO): A participatory tool for assessing farmers’ sustainable land management decision preferences and trade-offs. Nairobi, Kenya: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). 18p.
Lefore, N.; Weight, E.; Rubin, D. 2017. Gender in irrigation learning and improvement tool. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 40p.
Bell, A.R.; Shah, M.A.A.; Anwar, A.; Ringler, C. 2015. What role can information play in improved equity in Pakistan’s irrigation system? Evidence from an experimental game in Punjab. Ecology and Society 20(1): 51.
Bell, A.; Zhang, W.; Nou, K. 2016. Pesticide use and cooperative management of natural enemy habitat in a framed field experiment. Agricultural Systems 143: 1-13.
Meinzen-Dick, R.; Chaturvedi, R.; Domenech, L.; Ghate, R.; Janssen, M.A.; Rollins, N.; Sandeep, K. 2014. Games for Groundwater governance: Field experiments in Andhra Pradesh, India. Arizona: Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity (CSD), School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University. 55p. (CSID Working Paper CSID-2014-006).
Meinzen-Dick, R.; Chaturvedi, R.; Domènech, L.; Ghate, R.; Janssen, M.A.; Rollins, N.D.; Sandeep,K. 2016. Games for groundwater governance: field experiments in Andhra Pradesh, India. Ecology and Society 21(3): 38.
Meinzen-Dick, R.; Janssen, M.; Kandikuppa, S.; Chaturved, R.; Rao, R.K.; Theis, S. 2017. Playing games to save water: Collective action games for groundwater management in India. Tempe, Arizona: Center for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment (CBIE). 61p. (CBIE Working Paper #2017-001). Available at https://cbie.asu.edu/sites/default/files/papers/cbie_wp_2017-001_0.pdf (accessed on July 21, 2017).
Stopnitzky, Y. 2016. Changing preferences through experimental games: Evidence from sanitation and hygiene in Tamil Nadu. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01587. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Stirzaker, R.; Mbakwe, I.; Mziray, N.R. 2017. A soil water and solute learning system for small-scale irrigators in Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33(5): 788-803.
van Rooyen, A.; Ramshaw, P.; Moyo, M.; Stirzaker, R.; Bjornlund, H. 2017. Theory and application of agricultural innovation platforms for improved irrigation scheme management in Southern Africa. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33(5): 804-823.
de Fraiture, C.; Clayton, T. 2012. Irrigation service providers: A business plan. Increasing access to water for smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa. AgWater Solutions Project. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Available at http://awm-solutions.iwmi.org/Data/Sites/3/Documents/PDF/publication-outputs/learning-and-discussion-briefs/irrigation-service-providers-a-business-plan.pdf (accessed on July 21, 2017).
Otoo, M.; Lefore, N.; Schmitter, P.; Gebregziabher, G.; Forthcoming. Solar water pumping for irrigation: Business model scenarios and suitability for Ethiopia. Colombo, Sri Lanka: CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). International Water Management Institute (IWMI).
World Bank. 2012. Ethiopia - Electricity Network Reinforcement and Expansion Project (ENREP). Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/203661468030544126/Ethiopia-Electricity-Network-Reinforcement-and-Expansion-Project-ENREP (accessed on July 22, 2017).
Mukherji, A.; Shah, Tushaar; Banerjee, P. S. 2016. Kick-starting a second green revolution in Bengal. In Shah, M.; Vijayshankar, P. S. (Eds.). Water: growing understanding, emerging perspectives. New Delhi, India: Orient BlackSwan. pp. 483-489. (Readings on the Economy, Polity and Society)
CGIAR-IEA (Independent Evaluation Arrangement). 2016. Evaluation of CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems. Rome, Italy: Independent Evaluation Arrangement (IEA) of CGIAR. Available at http://iea.cgiar.org/ (accessed on July 21, 2017).
Gumma, M.K.; Birhanu, Z.B.; Mohammed, I.A.; Tabo, R.; Whitbread, A.M. 2016. Prioritization of watersheds across Mali using remote sensing data and GIS techniques for agricultural development planning. Water 8(6): 260.
Ahmed, I.M.; Gumma, M.K.; Kumar, S.; Craufurd, P.; Rafi, I.M.; Haileslassie, A. 2016. Land use and agricultural change dynamics in SAT watersheds of southern India. Current Science 110(9): 1704-1709.
Amede, T.; Awulachew, S.B.; Matti, B.; Yitayew, M. 2014. Managing Rainwater for Resilient Dryland Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: Review of Evidences. In: Nile River Basin, (eds.), Melesse, A.; Abtew, W.; Setegn, S.G. Pp. 517-540. Springer International Publishing.
CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 2016. Water-smart investment benefits ripple beyond food security.
Garg, K.K.; Wani, S.P.; Patil, M.D. 2016. A Simple and farmer-friendly decision support system for enhancing water use efficiency in agriculture: tool development, testing and validation. Current Science 110(9): 1716-1729.
Mekonnen, D.; Afreen, S.; Ringler, C. 2016. Drivers of groundwater use and technical efficiency of groundwater, canal water, and conjunctive use in Pakistan’s Indus Basin Irrigation System. International Journal of Water Resources Development 32(3): 459-476.
Moyo, M.; van Rooyen, A.; Moyo, M.; Chivenge, P.; Bjornlund, H. 2016. Irrigation development in Zimbabwe: understanding productivity barriers and opportunities at Mkoba and Silalatshani irrigation schemes. International Journal of Water Resources Development.
Mukherji, A.; Shah, T.; Banerjee, P.S. 2012. Kick-starting a second green revolution in Bengal [India]. Economic and Political Weekly 47(18): 27-30.
Mukherji, A.; Shah, T.; Giordano, M. 2012. Managing Energy-irrigation Nexus in India: A Typology of State Interventions. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). (IWMI Tata Water Policy Research Highlight 36).